In recent years, there has been a significant increase in the interest and importance of charitable giving as a part of estate planning. People are looking for ways to maximize the impact of their philanthropic efforts while also considering their financial and tax planning needs. Charitable trusts, such as charitable remainder trusts (CRTs) and charitable lead trusts (CLTs), have become popular vehicles for individuals who want to leave a legacy and support their favorite causes.
A charitable remainder trust (CRT) is an irrevocable trust that allows the donor to transfer assets to the trust, receive a charitable tax deduction, and continue receiving income from the support for a specified period. The trust distributes the remaining assets to a charity designated by the donor at the end of the term.
A charitable lead trust (CLT) is also irrevocable but operates in the reverse of a CRT. The donor transfers assets to the trust, making payments to a charity for a specified period. The trust distributes the remaining assets to the donor’s beneficiaries at the end of the term.
Both CRTs and CLTs have unique features and benefits and can be customized to meet the specific needs and goals of the donor. In this article, we will delve deeper into these types of trusts, their advantages and disadvantages, and provide examples of how they maximize the impact of charitable giving while meeting financial and estate planning goals.
Charitable Remainder Trusts
A charitable remainder trust (CRT) is a powerful tool that allows donors to support their chosen charitable causes while benefiting themselves or their loved ones. There are two types of CRTs: charitable remainder annuity trusts (CRATs) and charitable remainder unitrusts (CRUTs).
In a CRAT, the donor contributes assets to the trust and receives a fixed income payment for the rest of their life or a specified term of years. The income payment is a fixed percentage of the initial value of the assets contributed to the trust. The trust distributes the remaining assets to a designated charity at the end of the trust term.
In a CRUT, the donor contributes assets to the trust and, in return, receives a variable income payment for the rest of their life or a specified term of years. The income payment is a fixed percentage of the current value of the assets in the trust and recalculates each year. The trust distributes the remaining assets to a designated charity at the end of the trust term.
One significant advantage of CRTs is that donors receive an immediate tax deduction for their charitable contribution to the trust. Additionally, CRTs can be structured to provide a stream of income to the donor, which can be particularly useful for individuals with a low basis in an asset and who want to avoid a large capital gains tax bill. CRTs also allow donors to choose the charity that will ultimately receive the assets in the trust.
However, CRTs do have some disadvantages to consider. Transfers to the trust are irrevocable and cannot return to the donor. Additionally, the donor has no control over managing the assets in the trust, which may be a concern for some individuals.
Overall, CRTs are a valuable estate planning tool that can help donors support charitable causes while meeting their financial and estate planning goals. By working with an experienced estate planning attorney, individuals can determine whether a CRAT or CRUT is the right choice and structure the trust to meet their unique needs and goals.
Charitable Lead Trusts
A charitable lead trust (CLT) is another powerful tool that allows donors to support charitable causes while benefiting themselves or their loved ones. Like CRTs, CLTs are also irrevocable trusts. However, the key difference between the two is that in a CLT, the charity receives the income stream first, and the donor’s beneficiaries receive the remaining assets.
There are two types of CLTs: charitable lead annuity trusts (CLATs) and charitable lead unitrusts (CLUTs). In a CLAT, the donor contributes assets to the trust, and the trust makes fixed annual payments to the designated charity for a specified term. In a CLUT, the trust makes annual payments to the designated charity based on a percentage of the current value of the assets in the trust. The trust distributes the remaining assets to the donor’s beneficiaries at the end of the term.
One significant advantage of CLTs is that they can help donors reduce or eliminate their gift and estate tax liability while still providing for their beneficiaries. Donors can transfer assets to the trust and receive a charitable income tax deduction for the present value of the income stream that the charity will receive. This deduction can help offset the gift tax that would otherwise be due on the transfer of the assets to the trust.
Another advantage of CLTs is that donors can choose the length of the trust term, which can benefit those who want to provide for their beneficiaries but also want to support a charity for a specified period. CLTs can be an excellent estate planning tool for individuals with assets expected to appreciate significantly.
However, CLTs also have some disadvantages to consider. One significant drawback is that the donor’s beneficiaries may have a long wait before receiving the assets in the trust. Additionally, once the donor transfers assets to the trust, the donor has no control over how the assets are invested or managed.
Overall, CLTs are a valuable estate planning tool that can help donors support charitable causes while providing for their loved ones. By working with an experienced estate planning attorney, individuals can determine whether a CLAT or CLUT is the right choice and structure the trust to meet their unique needs and goals.
Differences Between CRTs and CLTs
While CRTs and CLTs are charitable trusts that allow donors to support charitable causes while benefiting themselves or their loved ones, the two have several key differences.
The most significant difference is how the income stream is received. In a CRT, the donor receives the income stream first, and the charity receives the remaining assets at the end of the trust term. In a CLT, the charity receives the income stream first, and the donor’s beneficiaries receive the remaining assets at the end of the trust term.
Another key difference is the tax treatment of the trusts. With a CRT, the donor receives an immediate tax deduction for the charitable contribution made to the trust. However, the income received from the CRT is taxable to the donor. With a CLT, the donor gets a tax deduction for the present value of the income stream that the charity will receive, which can help offset gift and estate taxes. Additionally, the income received by the charity is tax-free.
The type of assets donors can transfer to the trusts also differs between CRTs and CLTs. CRTs accept various assets, including cash, securities, and real estate. Conversely, CLTs are typically funded with cash or securities, as they require a predictable income stream.
When choosing between CRTs and CLTs, donors should consider their goals, the type of assets they wish to transfer, and the tax implications of each trust. For example, a CRT may be the better option if the donor wants to receive a stream of income during their lifetime. A CLT may be better if the donor wants to reduce their gift and estate tax liability while supporting a charity.
In some cases, the donor may use a combination of CRTs and CLTs to achieve the donor’s goals. For example, a donor may use a CRT to provide for their loved ones during their lifetime and a CLT to provide for a charity for a specified term. Ultimately, deciding which type of charitable trust to use depends on the donor’s unique situation, goals, and preferences.
Conclusion
In conclusion, charitable trusts, including charitable remainder trusts (CRTs) and charitable lead trusts (CLTs), offer a powerful way for individuals to support charitable causes while meeting their financial and estate planning goals. Each type of trust has unique features and benefits, and the decision to use a CRT or CLT will depend on the donor’s specific situation, goals, and preferences.
Working with an experienced advisor in philanthropy, accountant, and estate planning attorney allows individuals to create a customized plan that maximizes their philanthropic impact while addressing their financial and estate planning needs. Charitable trusts offer a way for individuals to leave a lasting legacy while also providing for their loved ones, reducing their tax liability, and supporting their favorite causes.
In the end, the benefits of charitable giving are numerous, and the impact can be immeasurable. Individuals can make a significant difference in the world by using a charitable trust while ensuring their needs and goals are met.
©️ 2023 Mark Matos all rights reserved
IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES
Last updated: November 6, 2023
Standard Disclosure:Advisory Services provided through IC Advisory Services, Inc. – An SEC Registered Investment Advisor. Medley Advisory, LLC. Is not affiliated with IC Advisory Services, Inc Important Disclosures Page:. Click Here The Investment Center: Click Here Form CRS: Click Here The content on markmatos.net is for informational and educational purposes only and should not be construed as professional financial advice. Should you need such advice, consult a licensed financial or tax advisor. This material is for informational purposes only, as of the date indicated, is not complete, and is subject to change. It does not contain any investment advice and does not address any individual facts and circumstances. Any investment involves some degree of risk, and different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, including loss of principal. It should not be assumed that future performance of any specific investment, strategy or allocation (including those recommended by Mark Matos) will be profitable or equal the corresponding indicated or intended results or performance level(s). Past performance of any security, indices, strategy or allocation may not be indicative of future results. The historical and current information as to rules, laws, guidelines or benefits contained in this document is a summary of information obtained from or prepared by other sources. It has not been independently verified, but was obtained from sources believed to be reliable. Mark Matos does not guarantee the accuracy of this information and does not assume liability for any errors in information obtained from or prepared by these other sources. Mark Matos does not give legal or tax advice. He is not affiliated with a legal or accounting firm, and he does not render legal, accounting or tax advice. You should contact an attorney or CPA if you wish to receive legal, accounting or tax advice. We strive to write accurate and genuine reviews and articles, and all views and opinions expressed are solely those of the authors. Please follow this link for disclaimers